Data Privacy: Germany's 1&1 Telecom Fined $10.6 Million for a GDPR Violation
One of the biggest fines for GDPR non-compliance has been issued by Germany’s federal privacy authority.
One of the biggest fines for GDPR non-compliance has been issued by Germany’s federal privacy authority.
On 9th December 2019, 1&1 Telecommunications was subject to a $10.6 million penalty from Germany’s Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BfDI).
The penalty was handed out as a result of the company failing to establish adequate technical and organizational measures to safeguard consumer information in its call center environments.
1&1 Telecommunication and Article 32 of the GDPR
Located in the city of Montabaur, 1&1 Telecommunications is one of the largest DSL and mobile service providers in Germany.
Additionally, the company is a subsidiary of 1&1 Drillisch AG, which is one of Germany’s biggest network-independent telecommunications providers with a customer base of 14 million people.
According to the BfDI, the fine was enforced after it was discovered that callers to the firm’s call center could retrieve consumer data by simply providing their name and date of birth.
The oversight body deemed these requirements insufficient for authentication and protection of consumer information as required by article 32 of the GDPR. Essentially, this article states, “taking into account the state of the art, the costs of implementation and the nature, scope, context, and purposes of processing, as well as the risk of varying likelihood and severity for the rights and freedoms of natural persons, the controller, and the processor shall implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk”.
Read about Germany's Federal Act on Privacy in Telecommunications and Telemedia (TTSDG).
Key Data Safety and Integrity Takeaways for Businesses
This case reveals that data privacy oversight agencies attach significant importance to the safety and integrity of consumer data.
Primarily, companies need to verify that they are working with the appropriate people and that they are not disclosing consumer information needlessly. In case a potential safety weakness is detected, businesses need to act swiftly and efficiently.
Another crucial takeaway from this case is connected to 1&1 Telecommunication’s cooperation with the authorities. According to BfDI, the company was transparent and cooperative after it was accused of having insufficient measures to protect consumer data.
The regulator stated that if 1&1 Telecommunication had exhibited a lack of transparency and non-cooperation, the fine would have been significantly higher.
Primarily, businesses need to ensure that they cooperate with authorities and act expeditiously to rectify the problem in question to minimize the severity of implied GDPR fines. Here are more of the highest GDPR fines enforced by regulators so far.
If you need help with your GDPR compliance efforts, book a call with us today.
Additional Resources:
Learn more about how to make your company GDPR compliant today, and download your free GDPR e-book.
French CNIL fines Google 150 million EUR.
Who are the Biggest GDPR Fines Culprits.
ISO 42001 Implementation: A Practical Guide to Building an AI Management System (AIMS)
Your organization deploys AI for credit scoring, customer service automation, and predictive analytics. Your data science team builds models. Your security team secures infrastructure. Your legal team reviews contracts. And yet, when a regulator asks "how do you govern AI risk across its lifecycle?" or "demonstrate your controls for algorithmic bias," no single team owns the answer — because AI governance exists in fragments, not as an integrated management system.
NIST Privacy Framework: The Complete Enterprise Guide to Privacy Risk Management
Your organization collects customer data across web, mobile, and IoT platforms. Your cybersecurity team secures that data against external threats. Your legal team drafts privacy policies. And yet, when a hospital employee with authorized system access shares a celebrity patient's records with media, or when a properly secured billing system merges two patients' data due to a configuration error, no existing control prevented the privacy harm—because the risk came from authorized data processing, not a security breach.
California DROP Act (CPRA) 2026: Compliance Requirements and DSAR Automation
California just made consumer privacy deletion requests unavoidable at scale. Starting August 1, 2026, every registered data broker must connect to a state-operated platform, retrieve consumer deletion requests every 45 days, and process them—automatically, verifiably, and repeatedly. Miss a deadline and face $200 per-request daily penalties. Fail to propagate deletions to vendors and face enforcement scrutiny that has already produced settlements exceeding $1.5 million.
- Data Protection
- Privacy Governance