UK DPA Fines TikTok €14.5 Million for Failing to Protect Children's Data
The UK's ICO fines TikTok €14.5 million for breaching GDPR rules on safeguarding children's data. Learn about the violations, implications, and lessons from this case.
The UK's data protection watchdog, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), has fined TikTok EUR 14.5 million (GBP 12.7 million) for failing to comply with data protection principles under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
The GDPR is a comprehensive set of data protection laws that applies to all organizations that process the personal data of individuals in the European Union (EU). The GDPR sets out a number of data processing principles that organizations must comply with, including the principle of lawful, fair, and transparent processing. This principle requires organizations to obtain consent from individuals before collecting and processing their personal data, unless there is another legal basis for processing the data.
The GDPR also sets out specific requirements for organizations that process the personal data of children under the age of 13. These requirements include obtaining parental consent before collecting and processing children's data, and providing clear and transparent information to children about how their data is being collected and used.
What was the violation?
In the case of TikTok, the ICO found that the company had allowed children under the age of 13 to create accounts on its platform, in violation of the GDPR's requirement that organizations obtain parental consent before collecting and processing the personal data of children under 13.
The ICO also found that TikTok had not taken adequate measures to prevent children from accessing its platform, and that it had not provided clear and transparent information to children about how their data was being collected and used.
What was the decision?
Based on the violations, the ICO fined TikTok EUR 14.5 million, or GBP 12.7 million. The final fine imposed on TikTok is significantly lower than the original fine of GBP 27 million, since the ICO did not pursue the provisional finding on unlawful use of special category data. This fine is a reminder to all organizations that they must take data protection seriously, especially when it comes to children's data.
How could the fine have been avoided?
There are a number of steps that TikTok could have taken to avoid the fine. These include:
- Implementing stricter age verification measures to prevent children under the age of 13 from creating accounts.
- Providing more clear and transparent information to children about how their data is being collected and used.
- Obtaining parental consent before collecting and processing the personal data of children under the age of 13.
By taking these steps, TikTok could have ensured that it was complying with the GDPR and avoiding the fine.
What are the implications of the fine?
The fine imposed on TikTok is significant for a number of reasons. First, it is the third-largest fine ever imposed by the ICO under the GDPR. Second, it is a warning to other tech companies that they must take data protection seriously, especially when it comes to children's data. Third, the fine could damage TikTok's reputation and make it more difficult for the company to attract users and advertisers.
The fine is also a reminder that the GDPR is a powerful tool that can be used to protect the privacy of individuals. Organizations that fail to comply with the GDPR can face significant fines, and they can also damage their reputation and lose the trust of their users.
What can we learn from this case?
There are a number of lessons that we can learn from this case. First, it is important for organizations to have a clear understanding of the GDPR and the requirements that it imposes. Second, organizations need to take steps to ensure that they are compliant with the GDPR, especially when it comes to children's data. Third, organizations should be prepared to face the consequences if they fail to comply with the GDPR.
The GDPR is a complex piece of legislation, but it is important for organizations to understand and comply with it. By doing so, they can protect the privacy of individuals and avoid the risk of significant fines.
Get Started For Free with the
#1 Cookie Consent Platform.
No credit card required

sec-GPC Explained: The Future of Browser Privacy Signals
You've spent months building a consent banner that finally passes legal review. Then a regulator sends you a notice: your system ignored 40,000 browser-level privacy signals last quarter. The fine references a three-letter abbreviation you've never seen in a compliance doc: sec-GPC.
- Legal & News
- Cookie Consent

OneTrust vs Secure Privacy vs Osano: Privacy Governance Platform Comparison
Choosing between OneTrust vs Secure Privacy vs Osano determines whether your privacy program achieves genuine governance maturity or merely checks compliance boxes. OneTrust dominates enterprise segments with €290 million in GDPR fines imposed partly due to organizations lacking proper consent infrastructure. Osano targets mid-market simplicity. Secure Privacy differentiates through AI-powered automation delivering 60-80% faster DPIA completion while supporting 130+ global privacy laws in unified pricing.
- Legal & News
- Data Protection

Do Not Track (DNT): Why the First Browser Signal Failed
In 2012, Do Not Track (DNT) promised a simple solution: a single browser setting that would tell every website to stop following you across the internet. Major browsers adopted it within months. Millions of users enabled it. Yet by 2019, the standard was officially dead, and browsers began removing the feature entirely.
- Legal & News
- Data Protection